Voy Por Ustedes

A dude in Australia has been convicted of possessing child bongo pictures after cartoons of Bart Simpson receiving a blowie were found on his computer! Say what? They're locking people up now for possessing Simpson's porn? Doesn't he get his knob out in the Simpson's movie? Does that mean the Simpson's movie is illegal in Australia too?

The judge accepted that these were not real people and no exploitation of actual children was involved, but felt that cartoons of Lisa and Bart tonguing each others rickers might lead to something far more sinister. I'm paraphrasing...I think his actual words were, "streuth mate, you can't look at cartoons of Bart's dingery-doo stuck up Lisa's goolerong, you're a mucky and potentially dangerous mongral, I fine you 3,000 dollery-doos."

Does this mean I can expect a visit from the RSPCA next time I watch Tom and Jerry? For fuck's sake this is surely a little over cautious? This reminds me of the guy trying to get on a plane at Heathrow with a cartoon on his t-shirt of an alien holding a laser gun, who was told he'd have to change his shirt because of anti-terror laws. Bart has been eight years old in that show for twenty years, they're not even supposed to represent kids are they? The characters in that show are all just a big metaphor for American society.

I can't accept that laughing at a picture of Bart getting his knob sucked is going to give you an appetite for paedophilia. It's a friggin joke, do the courts in Australia remember humour? Granted their funniest ever comedian was Paul Hogan, but their second funniest was a fucking transvestite, and this judge is worried about some one looking at cartoons?? They really ought to be able to distinguish between humour and a sincere intention.

You can imagine a 15 year old school boy drawing Simpson's porn on his English book, that would be fairly standard schoolboy humour. If he drew two actual child figures having sex then you'd have cause to call a councilor. If this guy who's been convicted had a bunch of drawings of realistic looking images then you'd have a case, but the friggin' Simpsons?

That was probably forwarded to him in an email by one of this mates, the whole world has probably seen similar cartoons.

If this is child pornography then surely the London Olympic 2012 logo is in breach cause if that isn't Lisa Simpson sucking Barts cock I'll stick a packet of Werther's Originals up my poo shoot.


I'm wondering whether or not I should ditch my A-Team DVD's now cause if the courts are no longer distinguishing between fact and fiction, the A-Team are probably classed as terrorists now. I've already ditched my Empire Strikes Back DVD because of the mild incest content and Who Framed Roger Rabbit because of the implicit beastiality.

Of course the real irony in this is that Australia's ancestors were all peeping Toms and underwear thieves lurking in the back streets of London's dock lands. Sexual deviancy is in the blood down there, just ask Barry Humpries. The harsh reality is that some bloke laughing away at Bart Simpson splashing cum on Marge's face is the least of their concerns really. Perhaps that's why they're making such a song and dance about this, they're hiding from the truth.